Talk:Kensington (UK Parliament constituency)

This article does not verifiably establish WP:PROF

In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Academics, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of third-party sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones, or self-published sources) suggests to some editors that multiple independent reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:EditorName (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it … I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings … I apologize if some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. §— Elections 2015 labour candidate badly input

It appears the above issue was resolved some time ago.- Adam37 Talk 18:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Kensington (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/electdata_2015.txt
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/electdata_2010.txt
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/electdata_1992ob.txt
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/electdata_1987.txt
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/electdata_1983.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)