Talk:Kanchana Sita
 | Kanchana Sita was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Improvements suggestions edit
Intro:What does "where Rama sends his wife Sita to the jungle to satisfy his subjects. " mean?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Reception: Sorry I strongly dispute that the film was the pioneer of "Independent film making.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- "Where Rama sends his wife Sita to the jungle to satisfy his subjects:" When Rama banishes Sita, Urmila (Lakshmana's wife) has a big debate with him. He justifies the banishment as "the will of the people" and not his own dharma as a husband. Thats why that statement which could easily get the reader into the story is used in the lead. Arfaz (talk) 07:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kanchana Sita/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk) 12:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
The writer is indef-blocked for copyright violations, so it may be best to quick-fail this. If you do want to continue, do a comprehensive source check, since there's likely a lot of problems hidden. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Due to those above issues, I'm going to fail this as a GAN. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 14:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kanchana Sita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725213426/http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/art.nsf/94ff8a4a35a9b8876525698d002642a9/c7693440bca3c3d7652572d000265e53/$FILE/A0190092.pdf to http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/art.nsf/94ff8a4a35a9b8876525698d002642a9/c7693440bca3c3d7652572d000265e53/$FILE/A0190092.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)