Talk:Kalimpong

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former featured articleKalimpong is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 25, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
April 18, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
February 12, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
February 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 1, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Former featured article

in Siwaliks or Mahabharats? edit

In the Himalayan system, Siwaliks are the outermost, lowest belt of foothills averaging about 600 meters high. The Mahabharats are a higher range behind them, generally over 1,000 meters and sometimes up to 3,000 meters that usually blocks views of the high Himalaya from the Siwalilks. So Kalimpong seems to me to be too far north and too high to be in the Siwaliks. Would it be more accurate to say this town is in the Mahabharat range? I would consider Darjeeling to be in the Mahabharats and it looks like Kalimpong is in the same range. --LADave (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Belgharia edit

Belgharia is a town near Kolkata in West Bengal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.247.134 (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Phone number in the wikipedia page? edit

It is entirely inappropriate to include one company's phone number in the wikipage. I am deleting it immediately. (MurakamiBhakta (talk) 21:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC))Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kalimpong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kalimpong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kalimpong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalimpong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kalimpong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalimpong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Kalimpong/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

A GA from 2009 that was once an FA. It has not been maintained to standards. Opening an individual GAR for 1 week to see if anyone will answer. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Keep honestly, I think the fact that it was once an FA has helped it. Only one or two uncited paragraphs, which I have smoothened or cut; references appear to be of good quality. Compared to some other GARs, this is rather good. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    there is still quite a lot of uncited material, even with your edits. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @Onegreatjoke: could you make a decision here? I'd say delist, based on the economy section not being up-to-date ("The town—earlier an important trade post between India and Tibet—hopes to boost its economy after the reopening of the Nathu La (pass) in April 2006".). Femke (alt) (talk) 10:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Femke (alt) (talk) 10:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply