Talk:KFRC-FM

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Raymie in topic External links modified

Scott and Casey edit

Allegedly, they are not currently on KIFR, though they are being considered for the evening slot, according to Casey 1. The station's website does not list anything for that timeslot (and I have no idea what they're currently airing). Therefore, I will change the time slot on the article to "TBA", since it has not officially been filled. Therefore, user 66.81.71.198 (why don't people register?) is correct, but I assume this information will be updated when the slot is filled. --Fightingirish 16:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Irene McGee and Virgie edit

Irene McGee's show no longer airs on 1069 Free FM, as I learned during a recent look at the station's website. And according to this page, the latest date on any of McGee's podcasts is Feb 8 2007. Her former slot (Fri/Sat nights 11 PM-1 AM) is now filled by The Virgie Show, whose eponymous hostess used to be a frequent guest on Sex With Emily. Roxtar 05:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Split off into KMPX (FM) instead of KIFR edit

A few weeks back, all of the historical 106.9 information was split off into a separete KIFR page, and some paragraphs from KFRC (AM) were copied here. This edit was questioned and reverted, but then was reverted back without comment. The split was not executed very well, leaving the KIFR article without an opening and this article without much context (no new material was added). Since the majority of the material split off was actually about the former station KMPX, I decided to instead restore the historical 106.9 history here, an split off the KMPX information into KMPX (FM), and cut down the KMPX info on this page. Hopefully my bold action won't be too controversial, but it should be better than the poorly-executed KIFR split (the user who did this has not been active since his 35 minutes of editing history). I have restored KIFR as a redirect to here. If more detail about KIFR is desired, it should probably go into the Free FM article, since it's probably more relevant there than here. I just don't think KIFR made that much of an impact to warrant a separate article, whereas KMPX in the late 1960s made a huge impact on radio broadcasting (pioneering the freeform, album-oriented, progressive rock format which dominated radio for the next decade or so). DHowell 03:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:KIFR-FM.png edit

 

Image:KIFR-FM.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

B-class edit

Really? Does this really have sufficient references to meet the projects guidelines? Vegaswikian (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KFRC-FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

It's finally done. There wasn't much to merge given the poor citation quality at the merge target, but I've been slowly adding new citations here to compensate. Raymie (tc) 04:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

In 2007, a significant amount of the KMPX-era history of 106.9 was split off into a new article at KMPX (FM), now KMPX (defunct). I'm proposing restoring the contents of that page into this one, KFRC-FM. There's no reason to have part of the history of the station in another article. Raymie (tc) 23:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Support merging KMPX (defunct) into KFRC-FM. Both articles are about the same subject with significant duplication of content.--Tdl1060 (talk) 03:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Support the merger as well. Picking and choosing for brevity purposes, there should be enough content here that can be sourced without too much trouble (same case with reconciling KFRC (defunct) onto the multiple articles that article overlaps with). I'd say a ceremonial merger can be had. Nathan Obral (talk) 20:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.