Talk:John Graunt

Image license/copyright problems

The image currently used (from Commons) is a photograph, apparently of an actor in a theatrical production, and is not old artwork. There is no licensing information--just a source, which also has no license information. I left a note on the talk page there, but could not flag the image since the database is locked at the moment. --Cotinis 15:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

More information about the photo is here--it is from 1993, and the licensing is not given. It is clearly not PD-old. I have added a note to the commons talk page --Cotinis 17:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

obvious grafitti / vandalism

the current edition of the article obviously suffers from vandalism, since the formula for 'expected value' reads "(i+am+a+massive+twat)/x". This article needs attention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.142.181.57 (talk) 19:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Infobox image

The Captain John Graunt?

I notice that this edit removes a link to this image of a Captain John Graunt. There was no explanation as to why the image was removed. Does anyone know why?

The assertion that he was a captain seems correct from a quick google search that I did. On the other hand, the guy looks like he is from the 19th century, rather than the 17th.

See the recent article IS THIS A PORTRAIT OF JOHN GRAUNT? AN ART HISTORY MYSTERY Eleanor J Murray, Leslie V Farland, Ellen C Caniglia, Kirsten S Dorans, Natalie C DuPre, Katherine C Hughes, Iris Y Kim, Claire H Pernar, Lauren J Tanz, Rachel M Zack American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 189, Issue 10, October 2020, Pages 1204–1207 https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/189/10/1204/5580104?login=true

Which firmly agrees that the current portrait used is from the 19th century, and - tentatively - points to another portrait which the authors think may truly represent JG. One way or another the existing picture I think should be removed as misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roseberyxxx (talk • contribs) 15:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Yaris678 (talk) 12:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Why is this image still here? The hair cut, the side burns, the collars on the jacket, all impossible for the 17th century. Doesn't anyone read these comments? On the designation "Captain", The text of the article refers to him as a major in a trained band (militia).Donfromconn (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

I agree with the last comment; it is a surprise that Wikipedia is still displaying an image which is fairly obviously wrongly labelled. It might not be a crucial matter, but doing so does rather undermine the general credibility of Wikipedia as a serious reference source. No reference source can be totally free of error, but it should avoid absurdity.Roseberyxxx (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

File:John Graunt.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:John Graunt.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Graunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229233126/http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=87099 to http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=87099

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Major additions to page

Hello fellow Wikipedians!

I have just edited Graunt's page in the following ways: (1) I edited the biography for some fact checking/addition of sources, (2) I added a section on Graunt's main work, Observations on the Bills of Mortality, (3) added photos of Graunt's work, and (4) added a brief section on Graunt's impact. I hope this addition is agreeable and useful to all! Ellamarrero (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

"Natural and Political Observations upon the Bills of Mortality" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Natural and Political Observations upon the Bills of Mortality and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#Natural and Political Observations upon the Bills of Mortality until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Mike 🗩 18:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Missing word in Biography

I strongly suspect that the sentence "King Charles II's recommendation was notable due to Graunt's status as a tradesman, as the King suggested to the Royal Society that it should accept 'any more such Tradesman.'" is missing one word: "not accept" rather than "accept". Weka511 (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)