Talk:Irreemplazable

What's True?

Why was the content of the DVD changed? Pls check this Walmart site,Walmart Info.

Pls. Check

I just wonder if what's the true format of the package. Billboard claimed it to be an EP/DVD however other online stores claimed to be a CD only. BritandBeyonce 13:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC) BritandBeyonce 12:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Get Me Bodied

Is it included in the package? BritandBeyonce 08:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I will erase first Get Me Bodied because it cant be seen in any sources we have. And besides, it's a Spanish and Spanglish EP, so why include Get Me Dodied? BritandBeyonce 12:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I've put it back in place.

They put Get Me Bodied (Remix) because she collaborated with Voltio, a slightly Spanish rapper. So it becomes Spanglish. Beyoncé Superfanatic 05:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Release

Does this EP released only on US (Wal-Mart) or in other countries also? Beyoncé Superfanatic 05:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

maybe because it charted on other country. But with a little promotion probably. BritandBeyonce 06:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

it's a compilation, not a studio album.

I find it hard to believe this can even be considered a studio album. 7 out of 8 of the songs are remixes, and the album hardly reaches 30 minutes. As well, since various publications have regarded Beyonce's newest album I Am...Sasha Fierce has her third studio album ([1][2]), I fill be bold and edit the article. — Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 03:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Irreemplazable might not be a Studio album in a typical sense but it's the only one of Beyoncé's side releases mentioned on any official site. Beyonce Online (her official site) Includes it in her Main albums discography (click 'Music' between 'Events' and 'Photos'). If not a studio album it is still a main release of some sort so I don't think it's a compilation so much as a mini-LP, which would agree with the article on Extended play. It gets complicated with this album because originally B'Day Deluxe was released along side a separate DVD anthology and Irreemplazable was a bonus disk. But on later editions it was replaced with the DVD and they were sold in the same jewel case and Irreemplazable was turned into a stand alone album with it's own DVD. I'm not sure what to make of all that but I think it should count as her first Spanish studio album. Also, you say 7 of the songs are remixes but really, only 3 of them are. The others are technically considered other songs like other english to spanish albums (like Mi Reflejo by Christina Aguilera). Ratizi1 (talk) 04:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

This page was originally categorized to EP. Why was this changed? Its pretty obvious that this is not a studio album. First, majority of the CD is remix, second, Knowles' third album is I Am... Sasha Fierce. --Efe (talk) 05:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

You can't say that her third album is IA...SF because every release from an artist is an album. the argument is what kind of album it is. I Am... is technically her third studio album, yes but the fact that it does contain some remixes doesn't make it any less of an album. If you want to call it a remix album instead of a studio is one thing and from your argument that's what it sounds like. Ratizi1 (talk) 06:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Um, ya. I missed to add that word. Someone should change this now. Irreemplazable is an EP. --Efe (talk) 06:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Irreemplazable/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 06:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Lead

• it featured as a bonus disc -> was featured
• a mixed review -> I don't know if I would call that a mixed review. We judge on its content, he just criticized the fact that it was released late. Its worth mentioning, but I wouldn't call it a mixed review

It was two and a half stars - isn't that mixed? Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

It is mixed. But I'm saying that you should imply another reason why its mixed. I'm sure he didn't give it a 2.5 just because of its release date.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Just waiting for this one Ada :) Try giving a better indication of why it received a mixed review other than its release date.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 04:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Background and promotion

• in the B'Day deluxe edition -> on
• Irreemplazable was also promoted on television channel Tr3s -> the, also how was it promoted?

Composition

• Fernández' fifteenth studio album -> studio album
• a theme song for Dreamgirls -> featured, from

Reception

• It is a mixed review. Imply though in the lead that its not just because of its release date

Credits

• Can you list their full names and link them once in the credits. Look at Rainbow for an example

Errm, their full names are listed... or do you mean their legal names; if so, why? And all the people that have articles are linked. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't see a few of these guys. J. Flores, R. Barba?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't follow. Where did you find Flores and Barba? Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

By the track listings :) Thats where I mean.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Gotcha! :-) Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

• Good work. Its a pass after the fixes are made. Sorry again about the delay :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 08:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

I think I got everything. Adabow (talk · contribs) 00:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Yup. Looks good. I'm passing.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 00:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irreemplazable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829002716/http://www.hispanicprwire.com/news.php?l=in&id=9164 to http://www.hispanicprwire.com/news.php?l=in&id=9164

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)