Talk:Imamate in Shia doctrine
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imamate in Shia doctrine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png)
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
List/Table edit
Shouldn't we have a list that covers all Imams and branches from Ali to people accepted by present-day communities as Imam (like the Aga Khans. Something like the table below from my suggestion at Talk:Caliph:
PLEASE: I know the facts below are not yet right; these are placeholders.
| (1) Ali ibn Abu Talib | ||||
| (2) Hasan ibn Ali | ||||
| (3) Husayn ibn Ali | ||||
| (4) Ali ibn Husayn | ||||
| Twelver | Zaidi | Ismaili | Others | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (5) Muhammad al-Baqir | ||||
| (6) Jafar al-Sadiq | ||||
| (7) Musa al-Kazim | ||||
| (8) Ali al-Rida | ||||
| (9) Muhammad al-Taqi | ||||
| (10) Ali al-Hadi | ||||
| (11) Hasan al-Askari | ||||
| (12) Muhammad al-Mahdi | ||||
I removed the claim that the Prophet Muhammad had always insisted that Ali was his sucessor and changed it to a more neutral claim that Shias believe that he listed Ali as his sucessor due to the incident at Ghadhir Khom. I believe whoever edited it before was a Shia, and including such information removes neutrality from the article, in my mind at least.
DigiBullet 20:11, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
assalam walaykum, i have just got a question for you muslims out there weith islamic teachings how would i come to terms with a muslim being a freemaosn
email me at sassysam92@hotmail.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.13.35 (talk • contribs)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Imamah (Shia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080329020223/http://www.balagh.net/english/shia/shia/10.htm to http://www.balagh.net/english/shia/shia/10.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080618012237/http://www.ummah.net/khoei/imam.htm to http://www.ummah.net/khoei/imam.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041025093409/http://philtar.ucsm.ac.uk/encyclopedia/islam/shia/index.html to http://philtar.ucsm.ac.uk/encyclopedia/islam/shia/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Consolidation of reference sections edit
Greetings and felicitations. Among other things, I just consolidated two of the reference sections. If you have comments or concerns, please let me know. —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 1 July 2019 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 09:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Imamah (Shia) → Imamate in Shia doctrine
- Imamate (Twelver doctrine) → Imamate in Twelver doctrine
- Imamah (Ismaili doctrine) → Imamate in Ismaili doctrine
– Currently we have four inconsistently titled articles: these three and Imamate in Nizari doctrine. I am proposing following the latter format because (a) the existing dab page is at imamate and this appears to be more common than imamah per Google ngrams and (b) "in X doctrine" is clear about what the articles are: a treatment about the general concept in a specific doctrinal tradition. I most concerned about consistency and could go another way on imamate/imamah or the method of disambiguation/description. Srnec (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.