 | A fact from Huequi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 09:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Porcelana geysers of Huequi volcano have formed 2.5-metre-high (8 ft 2 in) pinnacles? Source: Porcelana Geysers, which present anomalous travertine pinnacles up to 2.5 m height ... Porcelana Geysers are located over Barranco Colorado Volcano slope, in the Peninsula of Huequi
- ALT1: ... that 2.5-metre-high white rock spires grow at Huequi volcano? Source: Porcelana Geysers, which present anomalous travertine pinnacles up to 2.5 m height ... Porcelana Geysers are located over Barranco Colorado Volcano slope, in the Peninsula of Huequi
Five times expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 15:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Huequi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Frankly, I'm not sure if the hook as currently written would be interesting, or at least understandable, to a non-specialist audience unless there were pictures of the actual pinnacles in question. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there is no free image of the geysers. Also, I think that most people understand what a "pinnacle" is. Maybe "columns" is clearer? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- That might be better, but without images, I'm afraid the hook doesn't really stand out, since it might be hard for readers to imagine what they look like. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Proposed an ALT that should give sufficient information for people's imagination. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- That might be better, but without images, I'm afraid the hook doesn't really stand out, since it might be hard for readers to imagine what they look like. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Due to various real-life matters I don't think I have any time to complete the review anymore, although I am still skeptical about the broad interest of ALT0 and ALT1. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
ALT1 interesting for me. Checked expanded OK. Checked Earwig no copyvio. I will complete this review - hopefully very soon - feel free to chase. Are you looking for an article to review? If so are you allowed to complete my Template:Did you know nominations/Hoang Thi Minh Hong? Chidgk1 (talk) 14:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Added a QPQ. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Checked cite OK. Good to go with ALT1 
- Can inanimate rock really be said to "grow" Jo-Jo Eumerus? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- AirshipJungleman29 Good question. But as it is not in the article itself, as the reviewer I am happy with "grow" here in the hook as I believe hooks can be less "encyclopedic" and more expressive than articles. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- But I have no objection if both of you agree a different verb Chidgk1 (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, rocks can grow, c.f speleothems grow through the precipitation of limestone. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)