A fact from Hours of Charles the Noble appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the margins of the Hours of Charles the Noble contain 180 depictions of musical instruments (example pictured), providing a representative overview of medieval instruments? Source: Duffin 1997 and Winternitz 1965
Created by Yakikaki (talk). Self-nominated at 19:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC).Reply
Hi Yakikaki, review follows: article created 26 September and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited; a QPQ has been carried out; image works well and is appropriately licensed. Looks fine to me. On a non-DYK level there are a couple of citation errors: Meiss (1967) is cited but the bibliography lists only Meiss (1989) and Wixom (1964) listed in the bibliography is not cited - Dumelow (talk) 20:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the review, Dumelow, and for spotting those citation issues. I will fix them presently. Yakikaki (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply