Talk:Hakata-ku, Fukuoka

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move.

Requested move

(From Wikipedia:Requested moves):

Hakata, Fukuoka → Hakata-ku, Fukuoka – Comply with WP:MOS-JA. All wards should be -ku. All other Category:Wards of Fukuoka are already compliant.

Discussion

There is already a redirect at Hakata-ku, Fukuoka, but it should be the real article and Hakata, Fukuoka should redirect there. Neier 02:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Changes to Economy Section

I removed the list of airlines that have offices in Hakata-ku. It does not seem relevant to list a random set of businesses found in that area, unless there is documentation that this concentration is noteworthy or unusual. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

See also section (Dazaifu) deleted

The only link contained in the "See Also" section was Dazaifu. Since Dazaifu is a separate city, not a ward of Fukuoka-shi (as Hakata-ku is), there was no reason for this link. While there is a historical connection between Dazaifu and Hakata-ku, there is no current connection, and that historical connection is not discussed in the text of this article. As such, I didn't see any reason to keep a link to one of the many other cities of Fukuoka Prefecture here. If someone would like to explain in the main article why there is a connection, then the link and Section could be reverted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwyrxian (talk • contribs) 05:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hakata-ku, Fukuoka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050216144206/http://web.archive.org/web/http%3A//www.airnext.ana-g.com/company/index.html to http://www.airnext.ana-g.com/company/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131010074442/http://linkairs.jp/corporate.html to http://linkairs.jp/corporate.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://harlequin-air.co.jp/menu/corporate/corporate_1.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.harlequin-air.co.jp/j.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.japantoday.com/category/lifestyle/view/cruise-ships-with-chinese-tourists-pour-into-japan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)