Talk:Groundwater recharge in California

peer review

The article is very effective at maintaining a neutral and informative voice throughout

The organization of topics is clear and straightforward

I am not sure what other subheadings/content is planned, but I would say under notable recharge basins there should probably be two or three, and just generally building out the rest of the content, addition of pictures if possible?

I think the biggest thing you could do to improve the article would be to add anything with actual quantifiers or numbers, eg. how large are the basins, how much water is in the underground aquifers, how much is collected year to year, how have the benefits of recharge been demonstrated MusicGirl1115 (talk) 22:42, 25 July 2024 (UTC)