Talk:Green building certification systems
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Reviews for Arcticle Talk:Green building certification systems edit
in a whole content, it is a clear definition of the certification systems take place in different countries. as critics, to mention carbon mono-oxide [emissions] are good but there is no mention of VOC [volatile organic compounds] which are a highly more critical issue in correspondence with CO2 emissions, being more hazardous to green air. moreover, probably it could be better to mention a certified building for each case between Sweden to the United States and to make an evaluation for each different certification system standard. In a whole concept, good job, I appreciated, thank you.
--Dott Eng Arch SelaleSungur (talk) 13:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Dott Eng Arch SelaleSungur
Add examples could be helpful to understand the systems edit
The systems from Germany, Sweden, and UK is finely introduced with good information. However, if there are some examples of buildings that have acquired different rating levels under these systems, like the "Taipei 101" example for the LEED, and link the examples to their Wiki pages, readers might be able to better understand the systems. Qian Liu (talk) 14:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback edit
All in all a very comprehensive article that is well structured and has a perfect level of information depth. On a long term perspective, I agree to add some examples from practice. I only corrected some minor mistakes, punctuation, and linkages of DIN and VDI. Well done! --Floba007 (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)