Talk:Gravity Payments

Not notable

Only reason this is here is because of the recent news articles about the wage increase of their employees. Company itself is not notable, and the wiki page sounds like an advertisement. If it is to stay, this page would need to be completely rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.218.45 (talk) 12:55, 2 August 2015

Does not meet WP:CSD; article has extensive edit history. Nominate it at WP:AfD.--Forward Unto Dawn 04:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

in any case, the news coverage would make it notable. Drsmoo (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Removing the advertisement tag, I see no basis for it, article is fine. Drsmoo (talk) 19:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Not well written: repeated phrases such as "long-standing" is poor structure for any publication. Should be re-written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.217.192 (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Request edit on 19 November 2017

Hello! Requesting that the Dan Price redirect be made into its own page. He seems notable on his own, as most of the news and recognitions surrounding the pay increase- both negative and positive- seems to have focused on Dan Price as a person, rather than the company. Almost all of the interviews and national news appearances centered around him. I have a draft of a proposed page on my sandbox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BeekeeperRed/sandbox. BeekeeperRed (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Looking for input on proposal above, any suggestions/comments? Pinging a couple of editors who were previously involved on suggestion from another editor: User:Northamerica1000 User:Lemongirl942. Thank you so much! BeekeeperRed (talk) 19:14, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

"Dan Price" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dan Price. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. RayScript (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)