Talk:Goosebumps (film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by ScratchMarshall in topic Revenge of Slappy

Slappy the Dummy being in this movie? edit

I know I usually edit a bunch of Wikipedia pages and put reliable sources on them, but I must ask, why was Slappy the Dummy deleted from this list? There was a reliable source link that was from the Dylan Minnette tab that explained the plot, which had mentioned Slappy going in R.L. Stine's mind to free the creatures from the books.--Joey108 (Talk) 14:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Furthermore, the links to the other cast members aside from Dylan also mention Slappy in the plot.--Joey108 (Talk) 14:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

List of Goosebumps monsters edit

Shouldn't we make a list of confirmed Goosebumps monsters, since some of them are confirmed to be in the movie? Possibly a human cast and a separate monster cast page?--Joey108 (Talk) 8:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Genre edit

Please don't apply genre until the film is released. Trailers and ads may not accurately convey the tone or style of the film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


Are you guys Not telling the truth? edit

I was on Lad Vegas film critics society website, and Goosebumps was #1, doesn't that mean that it won? It looks like they won to me, also, why can't we have a list of monsters in the film, every time I add one, you guys get rid of it, why? IT'S TRUE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickDummy (talkcontribs) 01:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is the LV Film Critics link you are looking at, please note it shows a list of nominees. Yes, the sections are numbered from 1 to 5, but if you scroll to the top of the lists it does indicate it is a list of nominees, not rankings from 1 to 5.
As for a list of monsters, while I cannot speak for anyone else, I would remove it as trivial. Yes, we can make lists of various things in movies, but we generally do not. If enough people find it interesting, independent reliable sources will discuss it and we will include it. If not, we don't -- even if it is true. - SummerPhDv2.0 02:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


You know what, screw this, why am I even here, Fandom is better, because they accept everything I write, and I think millions of people found this intresting, it was the #1 movie in America during fall 2015 for God's sake! So good bye, and burn in Hell!

Im, sorry, not you, I'm talking to the people who do that— Preceding unsigned comment added by NickDummy (talkcontribs) 17:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goosebumps (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sequel Page edit

When is the sequel, Goosebumps HorrorLand, going to get it's own page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.95.142.233 (talk) 14:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Revenge of Slappy edit

In the film Black comments that this is a good title.

A similar "Revenge of the Living Dummy" came out in 2008. This seems to hint the film occurs prior to that.

Are there contraindications? Like books post-2008 being user in the film as monsters? ScratchMarshall (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply