Talk:Georgia's 4th congressional district

Out-of-date map and other page content

Ok, I've reverted all of the edits since Cuivienen's edit, since it was easiest to do, and none of the subsequent edits added significant value compared to the edit before it.

First, I'm not sure I disagree that it is appropriate to display a map of the previous district lines, if an appropriate notation is made and described in the article. I personally choose not to re-add the map, however, because I think people might find it confusing if there's no current map to compare it to. I don't object to others adding it, though, if the appropriate notations and descriptions are included.

Second, and more importantly, all Cuivienen did was replace the previous edit I made. The version of the article prior to my edit had several mistakes of fact in it (the district was not most recently drawn in 1996, for example), and it is for that reason that I have completely reverted the article back to my edited form.

Third, I do not think hypothetical vote projections as was included in the previous final sentence of the article fit the notability criteria for Wikipedia, so I have chosen not to include that sentence in my reversion, as well. It is more accurate (and certainly worthy of note) to say that the district has historically supported the Democratic party. If someone else chooses to re-add the statistical numbers, you should also include a citation for that number. --Jhortman 21:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I've added an external link to GovTack.us, where a (Google) map of the new district can be seen. However, does the article's list of included counties still apply? -Tobogganoggin ^talk 02:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind, looks like the same counties apply. -Tobogganoggin ^talk 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that link... that's a great resource. --Jhortman 02:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

History

Shouldn't there be a reference to Miller v. Johnson in the article somewhere? Akubhai 21:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

If I'm not mistaken, Miller v. Johnson was brought in relation to the 11th District, not the 4th. With that said, it would definitely be appropriate to mention the case somewhere on that page. I don't know that it's notable here simply because of the fact that the case involved racial gerrymandering, and the 4th is majority African-American. --Jhortman 22:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgia's 4th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)