Talk:George of Poděbrady

Problem

somebody needs to correct [some vandalism] I don't have time to do it somebody please fix that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.164.74.131 (talk) 13:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

I see you fixed the problem, thanks. I put a warning on the vandal's talk page and refactored your above comment because there is no reason to keep a record of the vandalism. Johnuniq (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

---

He was leader of the Hussites.

No, he wasn’t. The Hussite wars have already ended (1434) when he started to be politically relevant (most likely 1448 or a bit earlier, but not much) and the term “Hussites” was irrelevant afterwards. If the term “Hussites” means anything, than it was a coalition of various anti-Catholic groups in a coalition, but this coalition fall apart shortly after the end of the Hussite wars. George of Poděbrady was actually more a leader trying to hold together ALL various parties in the Czech kingdom (including Catholics for example) which however were more or less fighting one with another.

Ceplm (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes, he was leader of Hussites. Wars ended with victory of moderate Hussites and they formed political and military group, united in one ultraquist Church.--Yopie (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

V pořádku, češští právníci musej bejt hádaví a trvat na svém (jsa jedním z nich, vím o čem mluvím). Já bych řekl, že tohle je Váš názor a ne NPOV, ale nechám to bejt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceplm (talk • contribs) 14:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Name of the article

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_titles#Foreign_names_and_anglicization non-translated names should be used. Therefore, IMHO, this article should be renamed to “Jiří z Poděbrad” (with a redirect from George of Podebrady) Ceplm (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC)