This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Having now read the guidelines on notability, I believe there is a strong argument that Gameela Ismail is a notable person and deserving of her own page. She is well known and respected in Egypt and has a long history of political activism. I will take some time to review formatting of articles and then will update the article to better reflect this, so I hope a decision to delete the article can be postponed until then.
Kyrrah (talk) 18:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Maybe 60% of it is plagiarized verbatim from this source: [1]. David O. Johnson (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I just went through it myself; the amount of wording that was copied verbatim (and removed) was probably closer to 90%. David O. Johnson (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
