Talk:Galileo Probe

Entry Time

I've corrected the suggestion that the Probe entered Jupiter five hours later than scheduled. Not only is there no reference to this anywhere else, but that would be an incredible error for a space mission planned literally down to the second. On checking the reference given, it was a timeline in EST, which is five hours ahead of UTC, so a probe entry time of 17:04 EST is the same as 22:04 UTC (actual entry time).

There is a 1992 article giving the predicted entry time as 22:04 UTC, so in fact probe entry was exactly on time. Sjbradshaw (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Great info and argumentation. I wrote it in the first place. And without any explanation or other references it looked exactly like five hours delayed.

Why would it be "an incredible error"? I see many reasons for such an accumulation of delays and I don't see why it was of any specific importance to "be on time" with the entry. Anyway, great reffing and explaining. That's what we need! RhinoMind (talk) 03:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Galileo Probe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060929185050/http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov/Space_Projects/galileo_probe/htmls/Heat_Shield.html to http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov/Space_Projects/galileo_probe/htmls/Heat_Shield.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070101114453/http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov:80/Space_Projects/galileo_probe/htmls/probe_spacecraft.html to http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov/Space_Projects/galileo_probe/htmls/probe_spacecraft.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019034219/http://asm.arc.nasa.gov:80/full_text.html?type=materials&id=1 to http://asm.arc.nasa.gov/full_text.html?type=materials&id=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Galileo Probe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://spaceprojects.arc.nasa.gov/Space_Projects/galileo_probe/htmls/probe_spacecraft.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070108095028/http://www.mrc.uidaho.edu/entryws/presentations/Papers/laub_tps.pdf to http://www.mrc.uidaho.edu/entryws/presentations/Papers/laub_tps.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://asm.arc.nasa.gov/full_text.html?type=materials&id=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Entry speed

How could the probe's entry speed be 47.8 km/s? It had no way of decelerating until it hit atmosphere, so this speed would be Jupiter escape speed, 59 km/s, plus a little. 69.63.52.108 (talk) 10:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

As far as I know the probe was dropped from the orbiting Galileo Spacecraft. It is important to know the difference between the two. Because of this, I don't see any reason to introduce the Jupiter escape speed in relation to the Galileo Probe. RhinoMind (talk) 15:06, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

---

Hello. The ref below belongs to some obscure entry above. I don't know which entry, but maybe some editor can help out? RhinoMind (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC)