Talk:Functor category
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled edit
"a standard construction embeds a given category in a functor category; the functor category has much nicer properties than the original category, allowing to perform certain operations that were not available in the original setting.": 'allowing to perform'? Is that really English? Would it lose rigour, accuracy, conciseness, or other necessary property if written as 'allowing' or as 'allowing the performance of' or 'enabling'??? (I am guessing the author is trying to avoid using a person-specifying term such as 'you' or 'one' as in 'allowing you to perform' or 'allowing one to perform'? But I am not sure how important the term 'perform' is; what do the to my mind possibly extraneous words 'to perform' add that necessitate adding them instead of sticking to a concise construction such as 'allowing' or 'enabling'????)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Functor category. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031025120434/http://www.maths.gla.ac.uk/~tl/book.html to http://www.maths.gla.ac.uk/~tl/book.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)