Talk:FreeArc
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Ghettobuoy in topic Lol, this is pretty funny as far as issues go:
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Comment edit
Features section just copies what i've said on homepage. The only source cited as confirmation of this info is THG's article that's, again, just copied what i've said on main page. of cщurse, i believe that everything i've said is true (after all, my program isn't commercial) but actually there are no real confirmations of this info in 3rd-party sources. this becomes especially funny when it copies words that i've invented myself. for example, who knows what's "intelectual updating of solid blocks"? :) Bulat Ziganshin (talk) 18:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Lol, this is pretty funny as far as issues go: edit
- 64-bit archiver rewritten from scratch, is under heavy development.
- Development status Stalled
- User:Tatarize 18:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- I've changed the development status to Active. In future be bold. ··gracefool 💬 20:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, last running release 7 years ago, release not available from src repo, domain has expired, last lifesign a forum post 5 months ago...
- If you call that heavy development... --Ghettobuoy (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Disapeared ? edit
I notice that all links to this archive software are broken, even sourceforge project has been removed.. what's going on here?