Talk:Francisco Serrano, 1st Duke of la Torre

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Darth2207Lucas in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

Did I not read somewhere that Serrano had an affair with the Queen?

Probably.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's in Isabel II's page, at least. --User:Darth2207Lucas (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Removed unnecessary detail edit

Have removed the following as being of little interest in an encyclopedia - if for no other reason, none of the people mentioned are notable or have an article at Wikipedia:

  • Doña María de la Concepción Micaela Serrano y Domínguez (- Biarritz, 23 October 1941), married in Paris on 11 October 1980 José Martínez de Campos y Martín de Molina, son of José María Martínez de Campos y González del Álamo, ?th Count of Santovenia, and wife Elena Martín de Molina y ..., ?th Countess of Castelflorite, brother of her sister in law, and had issue:
    • Don Carlos Ignacio Martínez de Campos y Serrano (Madrid, 6 October 1887 - ?), 3rd Duke de la Torre Grandee of Spain, married firstly in Madrid on 8 December 1910 to María Josefa Muñoz y Rocca-Tallada (Zaragoza - ?), and had issue, and married secondly to María Mille y Campos, without issue:
      • Don Leopoldo Martínez de Campos y Muñoz (Madrid, 8 December 1910 - ?), 4th Duke de la Torre Grandee of Spain, married in Madrid on 16 January 1941 to María de las Mercedes Carulla y Rico (Barcelona - ?), and had issue:
        • Don Carlos Martínez de Campos y Carulla, 5th Duke de la Torre Grandee of Spain, married to Cristina de Montenegro y Macintosh
  • Don Francisco Serrano y Domínguez (Havana, 1 October 1862 - Madrid, 28 August 1942), 2nd Duke de la Torre Grandee of Spain, married in Paris on 14 October 1880 to María de las Mercedes Martínez de Campos y Martín de Molina, son of José María Martínez de Campos y González del Álamo, ?th Count of Santovenia, and wife Elena Martín de Molina y ..., ?th Countess of Castelflorite, sister of his brother in law, without issue
  • Doña Josefa Serrano y Domínguez (Madrid, 22 February 1865 - 1946), married in 1883 Russian Vasily ...vich Knyaz Kochubey, without issue
  • Doña Ventura Jacinta Serrano y Domínguez (Madrid, 2 February 1866 - 1890), 6th Marchioness of Castellón de la Plana, married in 1888 as his first wife Fernando Díaz de Mendoza y Aguado (Murcia, 1862 - Vigo, 1930), 7th Marquess of San Mamés, 6th Marquess of Fontanar, 9th Count of Balazote and 6th Count of Lalaing, and had issue:
    • Fernando Díaz de Mendoza y Serrano, 7th Marquess of Fontanar, 10th Count of Balazote and 7th Count of Lalaing, unmarried and without issue
  • Don Leopoldo Serrano y Domínguez (Madrid, 6 January 1869 - Madrid, 7 February 1916), married in 1891 María Gayangos y Díez de Bulnes (ca. 1870 - ?), daughter of José Gayangos y Urell and wife María del Rosario Díez de Bulnes y Espinosa de los Monteros, 4th Marchioness of Monte Olivar (ca. 1845 - ?), without issue

If anyone considers any of the above essential to the article, please return it. --Technopat (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 29 July 2019 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No prospect of consensus to move at this time. Andrewa (talk) 08:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply



– The subject of the entry looks like the clear primary topic among all his namesakes, with more visits and no reason not to assume the subject has a greater long-term notability than the namesakes. Along (and probably edging) "General Serrano" or "Marshal Serrano" the title is by far the most recognisable name for the subject in English-language sources.--Asqueladd (talk) 06:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Relisting note the other page was not tagged for this RM. It should be now, but this RM should not be closed for another 7 days. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sidebar discussion
To editor DannyS712: please clarify which other page? – Talk:Francisco Serrano has had an RM notice since the beginning of this RM. Paine Ellsworthed. put'r there  08:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Paine Ellsworth: but Francisco Serrano wasn't tagged until earlier today --DannyS712 (talk) 08:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Okay, that seems weird. wbm1058 should be notified. Might have something to do with the malformity I fixed. Paine Ellsworthed. put'r there  09:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
I see what happened – you stimulated the RMCD bot with your edits to this page at around 1:40 UTC. Paine Ellsworthed. put'r there  09:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – a primarytopic takeover needs a better rationale than "more visits and no reason not to assume the subject has a greater long-term notability than the namesakes". Dicklyon (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Dicklyon: "a primarytopic takeover needs a better rationale than 'more visits and no reason not to assume the subject has a greater long-term notability than the namesakes'" Such as?--Asqueladd (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Such as more visits than what; more than all the others combined? And link your evidence. And say why most long-term notability; often the first first with a name is not the most significant, but you're asking us to assume he is; are we supposed to go read all the articles to relieve you of needing to make a case for your proposal? Dicklyon (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.