Talk:Found (novel)

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Rident in topic changed

Untitled

edit

Okay, I recently read the very website that this summary came from! It's not very wikipedia-sounding, sounds almost like an ad or what would be written on the back of a book. This article can do better. Problem is, I'm busy on some other projects, so is anyone out there up for the clean-up? YelloCello (talk) 22:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Nearly all of the content was quotations from elsewhere. I removed all that and stubbed it down. --TS 23:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'd still argue that it sounds more like a summary instead of a plot description. Wikipedia plot descriptions typically describe what happens in the novel, complete with the ending, whereas summaries only describe it to a point and leave the reader wondering what's going to happen. I've never actually read the book, but I might get it and read it just so I can write down a more accurate plot description. -- Javawizard (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

CAN SOMEBODY PLEASE ADD A PICTURE OF THIS BOOK WITH ALL THE CAPTION INFORMATION? THANKS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.133.218.132 (talk) 00:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

changed

edit
i have now did what you asked for, 74.133.218.132. I tried to do my best. thanks!. Rident (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)RidentReply

random comment

edit

Dear Haddix,

your book suks. it is rubbish. I do not understand it atall. why use babies? were youhigh in the making of this book? BLOOOOBADY?