Talk:Fort Duquesne

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Headline text edit

what was the main point of Fort Duquesne


Strategically the Forks of the Ohio (where the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers meet to form the Ohio, site of present-day Pittsburgh) were hugely important in the 18th century. As everything west of the Appalacian mountains at the time was still wilderness, rivers served as superhighways of the era, facilitating the movement of goods and people over long distances where the nearest road could be many dozens, if not hundreds of miles away. Whomever controlled this important crossroads could control commerce for hundreds of miles around, and potentially make huge sums of money for themselves in the process.

France, whose colonies were based between the Atlantic and the Great Lakes in what is now eastern Canada, built a string of forts from Lake Erie down to the Forks, where Fort Duquesne was built. The forts were constructed partly to provide protection to French trade routes to the the Gulf of Mexico via the Allegheny, Ohio and Mississippi rivers, and partly to limit the westward expansion of English settlements over the Appalacians. At the same time, English colonists in Virginia and eastern Pennsylvania (both colonies claimed the region around the Forks as part of their territory) also had an interest in the area for its potential to generate huge profits from land speculation. Friction between French and English interests in the region controlled by Fort Duquesne sparked the French and Indian Wars in the 1750's.

Jmueller71 04:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Seems odd that a citation is needed about the forks of the Ohio being long seen as strategically important. There must be a ton of sources. I don't have time right now, but will find something later. Still.. seems like common historical knowledge, no? Pfly 15:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 edit

Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. --dashiellx (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation help edit

I am in contact with a professional voice actor who is trying to record a spoken version of George Washington and he wants to hear someone pronounce "Fort Duquesne". If anyone would be willing to call him up or even leave a voice mail with the proper pronunciation, please email me and I will send you his contact info. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 17:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Fortduquesne.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Fortduquesne.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fort Duquesne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply