Talk:Ford Falcon

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disambiguation page or not? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should the template:disamb {{disamb}} be added back and Template:Ford Falcon {{Ford Falcon}} added. Paul foord (talk) 07:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is certainly a disambiguation page. The template should probably distinguish between the different types of Falcon. St Anselm (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ford Falcon/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*There is no mention in the article of Egas (dedicated LPG/autogas) vehicles which is an innovative initiative of Ford Aust. Does anyone know the details/dates etc to insert a reference to same?

Falconrulz 08:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good article but not great. First of all the pictures may have to be listed under fair use tags and more information needs to be in the infoboxes. The article in general needs a slight cleanup. Not far away from being perfection, the Holden Commodore article is writes better that's not good for any Ford fans.Senators^{Talk | Contribs} 02:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 10:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Add topic