Talk:Flammagenitus cloud

Active discussions
WikiProject Meteorology (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Meteorology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Meteorology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Volcanoes (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

can be caused by forest firesEdit

Forest fire smoke can strongly resemble a cloud as it rises, probably on account of the water content from combustion. Would it be helpful to clarify the distinguishing features? 69.145.82.2 04:06, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

It appears those edits have been made in the wake of the Station Fire in Los Angeles. The presence of that pyrocumulus cloud hovering over Hollywood and Beverly Hills nearly shut down the 911 system as concerned citizens frantically dialed 911 to warn of the end of the world as we know it! LiPollis (talk) 03:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Flammagenitus vs. PyrocumulousEdit

The latter is the only usage I've seen, but I'm not a meteorologist. However, there is no entry for "Flammagenitus " at the AMS glossary, so I don't think this is a non-controversial rename. Hence I'm opening the discussion: should we retain the common name, or use this uncommon and awkward (to my eye) neologism of the WMS? --Pete Tillman (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

It looks like the WMO has introduced this term recently. http://www.popsci.com/theres-new-species-cloud-celebrate-with-some-pretty-pictures --Jonathan Williams (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
App the actual full WMO name is Cumulus congestus flammagenitus : [1], xref at pyrocumulous. --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Addition for climate change potentialEdit

Hello, I am a student at the University of Oregon in a Natural Disturbances and fire class. I was researching the topic as I love weather and the Flammagenitus fits in with the class. Based on a few articles found, researchers have found that these clouds can carry pollutants into the stratosphere which would suspend the particles for a much longer time. Since this is a newer finding, it is hard to say what kind of impact it'll have on climate change. I would like to add a section about the possibility of a link between the two as more information comes out. [1][2]Baseballkid10 (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Mustain, Andrea (26 January 2011). "Massive Thunderstorms are Traced to Intense Wildfires". Live Science. Planet Earth. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
  2. ^ Finneran, Michael. "Fire-Breathing Storm Systems". NASA. NASA. Retrieved 27 October 2017.

Title should either be "Flammagenitus cloud" or just "Flammagenitus"Edit

There is no need to disambiguate whether or not flammagenitus is a cloud, since that is the only meaning. With that being given, the title should be changed to either "Flammagenitus cloud" or just "Flammagenitus." Master of Time (talk) 01:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Return to "Flammagenitus cloud" page.