Talk:Evolutionary origin of religion

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evolutionary origin of religions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509063432/http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/2004_10_29_religion.htm to http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/2004_10_29_religion.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Evolutionary origin of religions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080807165354/http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Atran-12172002/Referees/ to http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Atran-12172002/Referees/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910084648/http://www.waspress.co.uk/journals/beforefarming/journal_20021/abstracts/papers/20021_04_s.pdf to http://www.waspress.co.uk/journals/beforefarming/journal_20021/abstracts/papers/20021_04_s.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910084649/http://www.arcl.ed.ac.uk/arch/watkins/banea_2001_mk3.pdf to http://www.arcl.ed.ac.uk/arch/watkins/banea_2001_mk3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

burial as evidence of religion

"burials with grave goods clearly signify religious practices and concern for the dead that transcends daily life." Many other prehistoric discoveries are also ascribed to religious belief. Nonsense. One of the major reasons for the evolution and existence of religion is to explain what is unexplainable--still it's primary function in contemporary society. Paleontologists who discover a carving, a petroglyph, etc. are prone to "explaining" the significance of such discoveries in terms that make them "understandable." There are many other possible explanations for such discoveries, none of which "clearly signify religious practices." Carving of fat lady may be early porno or just a pastime. Burying bodies with their earthly possessions may be a means of avoiding conflict over who would get them. Or just sentiment. Or not wanting to be reminded of the death of a loved one. My first question to any paleontologist who investigates such discoveries would be "Are you a religious believer?" Be very careful of "clearly signify." Relative to the existence of deities, those who believe in such things are unable to explain why, over the 200,000 years of the existence homo sapiens, that these deities appear only in the last 8-10 thousand years. So, where were these gods hiding for all those millennia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.160.205 (talk) 08:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia must summarize the views of mainstream scholars, via reliable sources. —PaleoNeonate – 12:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Claim of Chauvet animals half human

"Cave paintings at Chauvet depict creatures that are half human and half animal."

I have not found anything to support this claim. Can anyone verify this? ---Wolfe (talk) 03:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

The title of this article is an oxymoron

Religions say that there was no evolution. 172.58.174.142 (talk) 12:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)