Talk:Enamorado Por Primera Vez

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Enamorado por primera vez.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Enamorado Por Primera Vez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Since you have two Wikicup nominations in the queue, I believe it is appropriate for me to take one on! --K. Peake 17:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and happy belated birthday! Erick (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Magiciandude Your welcome and cheers for the wish; surprised you noticed the date was recently! --K. Peake 18:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Remove the recording date, as it is only sourced as beginning that year
• Remove the word studios from any of the ones in the infobox since that is of the same name as the parameter
• Link to the music video in the infobox
• Shouldn't the English title be in bold too?

No, since there isn't an official English-language version.

• Pipe pop to Pop music
• Wikilink power ballad per MOS:LINK2SECT
• "A music video for" → "The music video for" but the sentence should be the last one of the lead for the correct order
• "The track received positive reactions from three music journalists" → "The song received positive reactions from three music journalists," with the pipe
• "It was a recipient of the" → "The song was a recipient of an" plus start a new para at this sentence, as the following three sentences and the moved video sentence being afterwards will be enough
• "on top of the" → "on top of the US"
• Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine)
• "chart where it spent 12 weeks on" → "chart, spending 12 weeks at"
• "It also reached" → "The song also reached"
• Change Regional Mexican to Regional Mexican Airplay
• Remove the 11 weeks part because that is too much info for the lead when there's two charts mentioned in the sentence
• "it ended on the fourth and second position" → "it ended at the fourth and second positions"

Background and composition

• Pipe eponymous debut album to Enrique Iglesias (album)
• Were the 4.7 million copies sold worldwide or in the US; specify and if the latter, mentioned the US after the figure then change "in the US" at the end to "in the country" to avoid repeating the name.
• "reached number one on" → "reach number one on"
• "On August 1996," → "In August 1996,"
• "and that it would be released on" → "and it would be released in"
• "The record's title, Vivir, was" → "The album's title of Vivir was"
• "on December 1995 and was" → "in December 1995, before it was"
• "and co-wrote its" → "and he had co-wrote its"
• Since only Iglesias wrote the song, maybe you should mention it was solely composed by him with an appropriate source?

Re-used Allmusic ref from the album.

• Pipe pop to Pop music
• Wikilink power ballad per MOS:LINK2SECT
• "clarified that the title" shouldn't you write "the song" instead, as he was probably referring to that and it is what the lead says?

Yes, I meant "the song's title", but I took your suggestion anyway.

• "for the previous album," → "for Enrique Iglesias,"

Promotion and reception

• "and intersperses scenes with a" → "being interspersed with a"
• The Houston Chronicle review should be last since it is the only negative one
• "listed it as" → "listed the track as"
• "ten best songs." → "10 best songs." per MOS:NUM
• Start a new para at the award sentence that includes everything from there onwards, for separation from the negative review
• Remove pipe on "El Palo"
• The sixth number one and 12 weeks stat are not sourced; add the chart history at the end of the sentence using a ref name

I initially didn't think it was necessary to source the 12 weeks part, since it's later sourced in the body of the article, but better safe than sorry.

• "it spent 12 weeks" → "the song spent 12 weeks"
• Change Regional Mexican to Regional Mexican Airplay
• "charts where it spent 11 weeks on this spot on" → "charts, spending 11 weeks at the top of"
• Pipe to Billboard Hot Latin Songs Year-End Chart should only be on "best-performing song"
• Why is the Chile chart position not written here or in the lead?

I removed Chile because the charts are not from El Tiempo, but a reprint from a source that is not mentioned. Until I can find out where El Tiempo is getting the charts from, I'm going to refrain from using it.

This is the correct decision to make, as it is dubious including a chart when only the country it covers is known. --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

• The compilation albums should come directly after lead single since they are release info

Charts

Weekly charts

• Add the publisher in brackets for the Chile chart; I think it's El Tiempo?

See above.

Year-end charts

• Good

See also

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks amazing at 2.0%!!!!!
• Wikilink AllMusic on ref 1
• Remove wikilink on AllMusic for ref 2
• Why is there no work/publisher for ref 4?
• Cite ImpreMedia in via parameter instead for ref 5

Just to clarify, as in the work? The article was written for La Opinión, not ImpreMedia.

Magiciandude No, there is a separate parameter for "via" when you are citing what the article was written for; I have added for you. --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

• WP:OVERLINK of Gannett on ref 13
• Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) and pipe Nielsen Business Media to Nielsen Holdings on ref 15

External links

• Good

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed, after a quick review of this! --K. Peake 10:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! I've addressed pretty much everything and left a few comments above. Erick (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Pass time, sorry I didn't check until now but I was too tired to focus much on Wiki after work yesterday! --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)