This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
A "disambiguation needed" tag has been placed on the mentions of Red Sandstone. I would speculate that this should be Triassic New Red Sandstone from the location of the castle & distributions of the rock. This source (p138) says "The Triassic red sandstone of the Quantock Hills..... has been widely used in the area ...The larger manor houses and mansions which lie around the edge of the area, like Nettlecombe Court, Combe Sydenham and Dunster Castle. However this document (p8) talks about the geology being Old Red Sandstone. Any help or alternative sources would be helpful.— Rodtalk 17:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've had this problem on another article - I'm with Rod that it is probably New Red Sandstone, but in the absence of a hard ref, I'd be inclined to play it safe as per Nev's suggestion. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
(e/c with Hchc2009) Apologies for the tagging; I fixed a few things but couldn't work out the best one here. Old red sandstone at least appears to be in the right geographical area as compared to new red sandstone, according to that most reliable of sources Wikipedia (see those articles and also Geology of Somerset(!)). Natural England calls it "old red sandstone" in that article you link, Rodw, and also here, but I don't know why it also describes it as "Triassic", which would point to New (unless I'm missing something). This map (from Southampton University Earth Sciences dept) has "old red sandstone" in the vicinity rather than "new". This map has "new" quite close to Dunster. As I'm no geologist and my knowledge of Somerset is limited to cricket, Nev's suggestion looks good... BencherliteTalk 17:53, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to all for contributions. I think Nev's suggestion may be the best option particularly as in the 15th century (as the article says) "imported Bristol red sandstone" was used. Therefore local geology may be no indicator, and the stone used for building may be different from the mound it is built on mentioned in Note 1.— Rodtalk 18:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Dunster Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
.svg)
