Talk:Diving horse

Discussion

I'm sorry, "fell/dived"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.126.184.85 (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Does the "impact on science" have anything at all to do with horse diving? That sounds more like a random trivia subject, not a subject that has a place on wikipedia. Further more, it's mainly related to the measuring project, not to the horse diving.Student342 (talk) 16:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

New discussion

Renamed the "science" section, which is amusing and relevant to the diving events there, the sources check out. Good example of bad science. Added in the objected-to EL as body text. Article meets NPOV by discussing both the event and the concerns with it. Montanabw^(talk) 01:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Diving horse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060421210301/http://www.steel-pier.com:80/dedicated_to_the_diving_horses.htm to http://www.steel-pier.com/dedicated_to_the_diving_horses.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150121054330/http://fallmeeting.agu.org/2012/eposters/eposter/os21b-1720/ to http://fallmeeting.agu.org/2012/eposters/eposter/os21b-1720/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)