Talk:Did It Again (Shakira song)/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Calvin999 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 19:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking up the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
General

One dead link

  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Info box
  • Why is recorded 2008 and 2009?
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • This is an English language single, so Dexter doesn't need to be here.
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • As it is a dance song with elements of electropop and samba, electropop and samba should be removed.
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Lead
  • is a song by recorded by → Spot the mistake
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Is Shakira credited in the booklet as a co-producer? As The Neptune's rarely allow co-production.
I don't have the booklet, but many sites state Shakira as the producer of the song too. Shakira wrote and co-produced all the tracks on the album. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Okay.  — AARONTALK
  • Use a different word than "lauded"
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Put US before Billboard
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Should write 'chart' after the name of the chart
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Background and composition
  • from the album She Wolf → Comma after album
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • contains strong elements → Remove 'strong', it's superfluous in this context
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Critical reception
  • received very → Remove 'very', sounds bias
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Music video
  • I don't see the point of the one sentence block quote, just keep it as part of the prose.
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • This section could simply be two paragraphs.
I made the section into three paras- Development, synopsis, and reception. Is that okay? Or shall I merge development and synopsis?--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yep  — AARONTALK
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Live performances
  • She definitely performed this song on The X Factor in the UK.
  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Charts
  • How come US Tropical isn't in the table if it peaked at 11?
It is there. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Okay. The Latin Airplay bit threw me.  — AARONTALK
  • 2009 peaks should be in a separate table to 2010 peaks.
  Done They were all 2009 peaks, I don't know why there was 10 there... --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
References
  • MTV, Digital Spy, Allmusic, BBC, UK Singles Chart, iTunes etc. should not be italics.
Ugh, I did this all in the beginning and some users used AWB and removed all the apostrophes. Well I'll do it again.
They should never be in italics, they aren't newspaper/printed applications. Whoever told you to make them italics was wrong.  — AARONTALK
No I used the apostrophes to just cancel out the auto italicization of these entries. Anyways :  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done
Status

On hold  — AARONTALK 20:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passing.  — AARONTALK 12:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.