Talk:David and Charles Ltd

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David and Charles Ltd article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Companies (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies, Dislocated worker funding
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

WikiProject Devon

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

Devon portal v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Literature

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

Literature portal v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Trains

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. (December 2012)

Wikipedians in Devon may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

SophieD&C (talk · contribs) has been paid by David and Charles Ltd. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosure on userpage.

United StatesEdit

Why is this tagged with {{US-publish-company-stub}} when, so far as is known, Devon has not seceded from the UK and floated across the pond? If {{UK-publish-company-stub}} is unsuitable because of the US parent organisation, wouldn't {{Publish-company-stub}} be more appropriate? --Redrose64 (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

They're US-owned since 2000. Not much sign of US influence, but "following the money" suggests that including under US categorizations is appropriate. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)