Talk:Datagram Transport Layer Security

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Mikeblas in topic Library support

WTLS (Wireless Transport Layer Security) edit

Can someone comment on similarity/difference from WTLS (e.g. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/W/WTLS.html)? Yaron 22:37, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

I couldn't (although they sound very similar!) but I've stuck a request for WTLS at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cryptography#Some_open_tasks. — Matt Crypto 16:58, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Looked it up. Sec. 9.2 of this good article criticizes WTLS. The article does not give technical details of the differences, but there seem to be many of them. Yaron 22:22, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
The designers of WTLS simply were not competent and made numerous mistakes, one of the most serious being to get the layering completely wrong (it made no sense at all to layer it between WTP and WDP). See the paper Attacks against the WAP WTLS protocol for other problems. --David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Does this protocol rely on pre-shared keys? Trusted third parties? Exchange of pre-installed certificates? Exchange of per-session throw-away certificates? 139.169.172.141 (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Datagram Transport Layer Security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Datagram Transport Layer Security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Library support edit

I've added a ref improve tag to the "Libraries" section because the specific claims about library support are not supported by references in column headers. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply