Placement at Grylloidea (?) edit

Some rather disappointing comments above, but see no major objections here to the restoration of content at Gryllidae (done): in order to be taxonomically correct and avoid systemic bias. Personally, I am agnostic as to whether "crickets" should be placed at Gryllidea or Grylloidea – but suggest the latter to be consistent with the modern text quoted on this page … Roy Bateman (talk) 04:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Translation edit

In the Portuguese wiki, Grilo links to the taxonomic name rather than the common name Cricket (insect). I tried to change this but found that there seem to be links already created to other articles for Cricket (insect). I am not sufficiently familiar with the process to figure out how to fix this. Can someone walk me through the process? Vivafelis (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Crickets" as an expression is a misnomer edit

The "silent nature" sound effect commonly referred to is not actually crickets, but the sound of frogs singing. Shouldn't we document this misnomer somewhere? And a sound file of actual frog singing might make a good addition. JustinTime55 (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"A cricket" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect A cricket has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § A human until a consensus is reached. Skynxnex (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply