Talk:Court of King's Bench (England)

Court of King's Bench (England) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 26, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 7, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that between 1560 and 1640, the business of the English Court of King's Bench rose tenfold?

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Court of King's Bench (England)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Aiken ♫ 15:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is very good indeed, and I think you should consider trying for a FA. It meets all criteria pretty easily. Just some very minor points:

Reform

I don't understand what "Fairfax J" is.
Mr Justice Fairfax, or Judge Fairfax - it's legally abbreviated as Fairfax J, or LJ, or MR, depending on the title. Ironholds (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Struggle with the Common Pleas

"then the very attorneys of the Common Pleas boggled at them and carried all their finable business to the King's Bench" needs attributing.
Fixed. Ironholds (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

General

Keep the capitalisation of "king" consistent. Sometimes it's capitalised, sometimes not. Choose one and stick with it.
Fixed, I think. Ironholds (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

As soon as these have been addressed I'll pass the article. Aiken ♫ 18:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Great, passing. Aiken ♫ 19:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic