Talk:Countermeasure (computer)

Computer Security: Computing Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reassessment Comments edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I downgraded this article from C-class to Start-class because it was an introduction and a single section with many items uncovered.

To move the article back to C-class or above I would consider the follow at a minimum:

Incorporate as many of the "see also" items into the article as would be logical; don't just shove them in anywhere.
Consider adding other sections about Attacks including famous attacks, how to prevent attacks, the business market that grew into existence because of attacks, etc.
Consider including more sources or increase inline references to some of the currently unsourced comments and paragraphs.

§ Music Sorter § (talk) 07:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pls convert the txt image to an actual picture edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Somebody please create an image of it: it looks terrible as txt.

--Fixuture (talk) 14:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rewriting the introduction into multiple sections edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Right now the introduction is kind of a mess (just the position of the Table of Contents should prove that). Does anyone have any good ideas of how to rework this (beyond whatever I might have done by the point that you have read this? By the way, I really agree with both § Music Sorter § and Fixuture on this about what could be changed and added as well.

The Amazing Matt (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic