Talk:Coronation of George VI and Elizabeth

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Coronation of H.M. George VI and Queen Elizabeth.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

FYI TL:DR Deletion request failed, ignore - 86.128.235.116 (talk) 01:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Reference of the Princesses

I checked MOS:HONORIFIC and I still fail to see why the Princesses’ article of “The” can’t be used in reference. They weren’t just “Princess Elizabeth” and “Princess Margaret,” for they were daughters of the British sovereign. This is convention as with subsequent articles like the children referred to in the article of the coronation of George V and Mary, and so forth. The article” “The” doesn’t seem to be an honorific, but a mere article for distinction as princesses of the United Kingdom as the children of the sovereign. AKTC3 (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I think it is an honorific, but even if it isn't, it's unnecessary jargon, and articles should be written in plain English. DrKay (talk) 18:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Bromsgove "artwork"

Artwork commemorating the Coronation of King George VI in 1937 at a post office in Bromsgrove

We had this image in the article, captioned:

Artwork commemorating the Coronation of King George VI in 1937 at a post office in Bromsgrove

It looks to me to be the standard monogram-and-date used on most British Crown (i.e. main) Post Offices of the period. I have removed it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)