Constitution of La Yara, or La Yaya?

edit

I tried to look up the text of the "Constitution written at La Yara in 1896" mentioned in the article, but the closest I can find is the "Constitución de La Yaya de 1897." For the text, see http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/servlet/SirveObras/00362952322269495209079/p0000001.htm#I_3_

Is this what the article refers to? Should "La Yara in 1896" be emended to "La Yaya in 1897"? I assume that the "Grito de la Yara" (1868) is responsible for the confusion?

-Potosino 05:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes La Yaya is correct. I'll add a bit. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 01:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitution of Cuba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

2019 Constitution and same-sex marriage

edit

Shouldn't the article say that this document "formally" recognizes same-sex marriages rather than that it "formerly" recognized them. I think the former is what is now true.2600:1004:B1C5:F530:0:2D:500F:1A01 (talk) 15:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article 53 gave citizens freedom of speech, and Article 54 gave citizens the right to assemble.

edit

The statement deserves a comment. Xx236 (talk) 08:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The freedom of speach is limited, so the statement is manipulated. Xx236 (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply