Talk:Compliance (psychology)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kangw01. Peer reviewers: Rdewitt92, Simonecedotal.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Merger proposal

This article is quite short, and the articles listed are de facto sub-articles lacking context. One of the sub-articles is duplicated with different spelling.--Boson (talk) 06:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Support as nominator.--Boson (talk) 06:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I would agree, this has everything to do with all techniques involved in compliance, psychologically speaking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vash4me (talk • contribs) 13:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Support relivance/examples --Cs california (talk) 09:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, but leave the other articles or make into sub-articles. The sub-subjects are notable in their own respect. 75.170.42.250 (talk) 01:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Support as current page is very short --USER:AlanH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.221.95 (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

"Support" the low-ball technique is valid and is taught as a part of compliance in Universities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.28.208.175 (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

"Against" This page, along with the foot-in-the-door page stand on their own, and it is likely that a great deal of valid information would be lost if a merger were to occur. 71.186.28.60 (talk) 01:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

"Against" Ingratiation is one specific compliance technique but an important one and fully deserves to be separate. Ingratiation also ties in with other contexts such as superficial charm and psychological manipulation. --Penbat (talk) 13:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)