Add topic
Active discussions
WikiProject Military history (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Juridical statusEdit

It seems that the concept of combatant has no existence, at least in international treaties. Hague Conventions and Third Geneva Convention are concerned by prisoner of war status and civilian status. Anybody out there? This article should be restricted to juridical definition, not broad dictionary definition (everybody knows what "to fight" means, this is not the scope of this article). Kaliz 17:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Remember WP:IANALEdit

My revision to this article moved its phrasing a bit further away from that of the Third Geneva Convention. I remind any reader who might derive legal advice from this that Wikipedia does not give legal opinions, and that there's really no substitute to the Geneva Conventions themselves when you're planning your insurgency. ExOttoyuhr (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Levée en masseEdit

The Levée en masse isn't even mentioned here! Each civilian has the right to fight against foreign invaders, and they have to be treated as combattants as long as they do not conceal their weapons. So the "insurgents" in Iraq who are clearly fighting against foreign invaders are combattants in legal terms and must be treated like POWs according to the Geneva Conventions. They must not be tortured and the IRC must be granted access to the POW camp/prison they are being held in! -- (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Combatant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


"Privileged combatant" is used, in the Geneva Conventions, as a synonym for "Lawful combatant". This article contrasts "Privileged combatant" with "unprivileged combatant" - a term that I believe is NOT defined in international law. I suspect this term is an instance of WP:SYNTH... Someone assumed that, since the term privileged combatant is used in international law that "unprivileged combatant" is also a meaningful legitimate term. Geo Swan (talk) 09:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)