Talk:Clockers (film)

PoV

this description does not do a good job of taking an objectional view Paskari 01:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Article needs to be fixed

Why is the plot here? I suggest we delete the whole section, or at least cut it down to a short paragraph that doesn't give everything away. If I have time, I might do it.Dean Sayers 11:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

It says spoilers. Don't like it, don't read it. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia and cutting out stuff that would be spoilers isn't encyclopedic. 74.139.197.26 06:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Encyclopedic does not mean blow-by-blow he did this, he did that, we see this, just then that. A plot summary *summarizes* the story to the essentials. This is one of the worst-written plot summaries I've seen on Wikipedia. Most are too long by at least half -- this is just trying to recount visuals instead of exposition. --Dhartung | Talk 02:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

It should also mention that the plot, especially the ending, makes no sense. Who actually killed Darryl? Why was no one charged? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.176.54 (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Clockers.jpg

Image:Clockers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Shot in New Mexico?

Someone tagged this movie as having been shot in New Mexico. Is there any real fact behind this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.189.26 (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Rated on Rotten Tomatoes, but predates RT

Uh, RT was founded in 1998; the film came out in 1995. It couldn't have "earned" a rating on RT at the time.

RT could've viewed the film later. Not to mention they collect reviews from way back.--Filmomusico (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)