Talk:Clark, South Dakota

Latest comment: 4 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Clark, South Dakota

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Clark, South Dakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Clark, South Dakota edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Clark, South Dakota's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "2018 Pop Estimate":

  • From Aberdeen, South Dakota: "Population Estimates". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  • From Rapid City, South Dakota: "Population Estimates". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved May 30, 2019.
  • From Tea, South Dakota: "Population Estimates". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved May 30, 2019.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 03:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply