Talk:Citizendium

Latest comment: 7 months ago by MarchOfTheGreyhounds in topic Recent status
Former good articleCitizendium was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 29, 2014Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Citizendium Statistics vs. Recent Changes pages edit

I'd note that while https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:Statistics , accessed today, shows zero active users in the last 30 days, Citizentium is not entirely dead; https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges shows a few users are still editing the site as recently as today. Presumably their stats system is broken. — The Anome (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Recent status edit

Is it really appropriate to add commentary about the site's recent status based on the primary source of Wikimedia's recent contributions page? I would argue no, so I am reverting this for now. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 02:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fine by me either way, but the Decline section already used a few like that (citing RC or site statistics), which isn't so unusual for sites that self-report stats. – SJ + 03:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
You certainly weren't the first to add this kind of content. I also see something similar was recently removed by @X-Editor (perhaps for the same reason? There was no edit summary). I think more similar content may need to be removed from the article. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply