Talk:Chuck Taylor All-Stars

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 70.163.208.142 in topic Low top is not CT


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cwalmsley94.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

not a subsidiary edit

nike bought the brand name when the company went out of business. i don't think "subsidiary" is the right term.

2601:48:C601:50E0:247F:1E95:5B7C:F9FE (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)gtbear@gmail.comReply

Source given later in article - [1] - states Nike "agreed to buy Converse.” A slightly fuller timeline might be synthesized from [2] and [3], but I can find nothing referencing an IP-only deal. V/R, 50.81.24.10 (talk) 00:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Uses of chuck Taylor edit

Gdhdjn&r 105.112.61.236 (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Low top is not CT edit

While for all intents and purposes the low top is the same shoe, only the high top version is a Chuck Taylor. They are however both Converse All-Stars. Chuck Taylor is synonymous with the high top version bearing the round patch. The photo of the shoes here is unfortunate as it shows the low top version which as mentioned is technically not a Chuck Taylor & is just slightly less infamous in pop culture. (I don’t know how to submit an edit request but this is my attempt) HoyaLibris (talk) 01:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

That picture was recently changed, in this edit.[4] Aesthetically I prefer the older high-top picture, but does this article say "the low top version ... is technically not a Chuck Taylor"? 70.163.208.142 (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply