Talk:Chorography

Latest comment: 8 months ago by GrindtXX in topic tabula chorographica

Pomponius Mela edit

A section was deleted concerning Pomponius Mela. I'm not familiar with the subject, but did a cursory google, and found The Description of the World (Chorographia), written by Pomponius Mela c.44CE, and Pomponii Melae De Chorographia Libri Tres (possibly the same item?).

Leaving here, for whoever is interested, to fix up. -- Quiddity (talk) 22:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Use in astrology edit

I am reviewing Benjamin Dykes' latest compilation of translations, Astrology of the World I: The Ptolemaic Inheritance (Cazimi Press, 2013). Part IV has an extensive section on Chorography. In it I find chorography to be the source of astrological rulerships of specific geographic locations, which are essential to mundane astrology, and which are otherwise inexplicable to modern astrologers, who still use them. The authors Dykes translates include Ptolemy, Dorotheus, the Arabic al-Rijal, Abu Ma'shar, Al-Biruni, Ibn Ezra, Ibn Labban, Masha'allah, Bonatti and William Lilly. All but al-Rijal have Wiki entries.

Wiki will have all kinds of problems with this, but let's not drag them up. It might be that Wiki can enhance its articles on Greco-Roman astrology in some fashion. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.3.151.239 (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chorography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chorography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Link updated. GrindtXX (talk) 13:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

overlap with "local history" edit

There would seem to be a significant overlap with Local history; not sure why there wasn't a link to that article until I added a "see also" link just now... AnonMoos (talk) 13:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

tabula chorographica edit

The article currently claims (under "Renaissance revival") that "An early instance [of the revived use of the term] is a small-scale map of Britain in an early fifteenth-century manuscript, which is labelled a tabula chorographica". I added this sentence myself in July 2011. The statement is accurate per the cited source, but a recent article by Alfred Hiatt ("The Map of Britain in British Library, MS Harley 1808", Imago Mundi, vol. 74(2) (2022), pp. 173-88 (at p. 173 and nn. 2 & 3)) points out that it's based on a misunderstanding: the description actually comes from an 18th-century catalogue entry, so is not particularly early or noteworthy. I'm therefore going to delete the sentence. GrindtXX (talk) 00:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply