Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?

Wetman

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 March 2020 and 6 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vickyyvyvy. Peer reviewers: Ckthayer.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was move. Jafeluv (talk) 21:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Zhang DaqianChang Dai-chien — There is no reason to believe a person who fled China in 1948 and never set foot since would agree his name to be romanized in pinyin. Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 19:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Since the sources use Wade-Giles, we probably should too. But a redirect (and mention of the pinyin, for those who understand no other) would be good things too. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Check out the article's references. — AjaxSmack 21:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Speculations as to his preferred Romanization are irrelevant. I support the move, however, for the same reasons Septentrionalis does. --Atemperman (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Meeting with Picasso 1953 or 1956 or both? edit

The current article has Chang Dai-chien meeting with Picasso in 1953. That claim is sourced and cited, but I've seen other mentions that the meeting was in 1956. Did they meet twice? Is one of the dates (1953 vs. 1956) erroneous (i.e., the cited source is in error, or other sources are in error)? --Quartermaster (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The works of Chang Dai Chien (as opposed to his forgeries) edit

The current article lacks such a section. Apart from being a master forger of the greatest painters of China,Chang was one of the greatest himself. Museums in Taipei and Beijing have the best collections of his work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.157.131.197 (talk) 04:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zhang Daqian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zhang Daqian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply