Talk:Carolina Rebellion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carolina Rebellion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
I'm new to wikipedia, but I'm going to try and fix some of the errors on this page - namely the way it reads like an advertisement.
Page Griefing edit
It made me mad to see that someone griefed this whole page and no one is yet to clean it up! I'm gonna clean it up now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PugsNotDrugsHD333 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- What's page griefing? Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oh I just looked at your edits to the article that were deleted by another editor. You mean that unreferenced content was removed based on WP:V and you instead added unsourced content. That's probably not going to get you very far. It's best to add references for all of the content from reliable sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Someone took everything down — Preceding unsigned comment added by PugsNotDrugsHD333 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Why yes, they did. Did you not understand what I wrote? I explained why it was "taken down" (or more correctly deleted, or in Wikipedia terms, reverted). If you have a specific question, please ask it. I won't be responding to any further terse comments you make. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Notability edit
I pulled up 400+ references on Google News. Many look like passing references but with 50,000+ attendees, I'm confident this is notable:
--2600:1004:B05D:BCCA:2CDF:5008:6D93:1A24 (talk) 14:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- WP:N, and probably WP:GNG, define notability, not number of passing references, although that does come into part of the definition. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carolina Rebellion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120410212849/http://carolinarebellion.com:80/lineup_2011.html to http://carolinarebellion.com/lineup_2011.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)