Talk:Camäleon-class gunboat

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Peacemaker67 in topic GA Review
Good articleCamäleon-class gunboat has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starCamäleon-class gunboat is the main article in the Camäleon-class gunboats series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 30, 2017Good article nomineeListed
October 24, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Camäleon-class gunboat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 01:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


This article is in good shape. I have just a few comments/queries:

  • there is a repetition of the word "several" in the lead which jars a bit. Perhaps use an alternative for the first instance? Like "some"?
    • Good catch
  • suggest linking Prussian Navy at first mention in the body
    • Done
  • suggest linking Prussian Army at first mention
    • Done
  • there are two links on Landtag, one to the Prussian, one to the more generic term, I suggest linking to the Prussian one at first mention
    • Good catch
  • given two of the ships never carried the 15 cm gun, perhaps include the re-armament in the lead?
    • Good idea
  • is there anything about Comets involvement in the Battle of Jasmund that can be added?
    • Added a bit
  • suggest linking squadron
    • Done
  • perhaps the mention of Prussian army should be Prussian Army?
    • Fixed
  • is there anything that can be said about Meteors involvement in the Battle of Havana?
    • Added a couple of lines
  • I believe File:Josef Carl Püttner Seegefecht bei Helgoland 1864.jpg needs a PD-US tag?
    • Fixed

That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:39, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply