Talk:Burnham Pavilions

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Victorgrigas in topic Video here if anyone wants to add it
Good articleBurnham Pavilions has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 31, 2009Good article nomineeListed
September 6, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
January 25, 2022Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This isn't a proper review - but were I to take this up I'd have to say that I'd be doubtful of passing it because it is about an ongoing project, so the stability of the article is doubtful. Alan16 (talk) 03:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I will look a few things up. It should be completed now.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Okay. I'd seek another reviewer though - I'm not Mr. Popular at the moment when it comes to GA reviews. Alan16 (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review 2 edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pavilion projects/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    I added a citation to the lead.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The map looks good.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    This a definitely great article. Please I'd like this to reach FA soon. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Video here if anyone wants to add it edit

[1] i suggest using firefogg to convert :) Victor Grigas (talk) 07:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply