Talk:Bukovac, Novi Sad
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 23 August 2018 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page Moved per the consensus below L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 | It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links: current log • target log |
– A clear case of absence of a primary topic (no reason to prefer this settlement over the others, see also the corresponding articles in other language wikipedias). I'm starting a formal discussion only in order to determine the correct disambiguated title for the current article: should it be Bukovac, Novi Sad (or Bukovac (Novi Sad), which uses the widely know name of the city of which this is a part of, rather than the more standard, but less recognisable format that uses the municipality name Bukovac, Petrovaradin? – Uanfala (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- We've had some back at forth at WT:SERBIA over WP:SRBPLACE, and in the end it remained unclear over such details. I'd settle for Bukovac, Novi Sad, as the city is a better disambiguator, and we kind-of switched to comma convention. No such user (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support move to Bukovac, Novi Sad per nom. Daß Wölf 00:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom, given the large number of possible meanings. bd2412 T 18:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.