Talk:Bruker

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Article confusion

I nominated this article for deletion because it seems confusing and, ultimately, unverifiable/not useful. The article describes Bruker Corporation as its parent, so presumably this article's subject is a subsiduary. It talks about the production of scientific instruments. The Bruker Corporation website does not list its headquarters as Massachussetts, USA - this is the address of Bruker Daltonics Inc. Sionk (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

It's been reworded to make it clear the subject is Bruker Corporation Sionk (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bruker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121104094601/http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=BRKR to http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=brkr

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Merger proposal

It seems to me that Günther Laukien Prize should be merged to this article as not independently notable of the corporation. SL93 (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Oppose on the grounds that merging to ENC (had they a page) would be more appropriate than merging to Bruker (the funder). It's also not uncommon for major prizes to have a separate page, (there are vast number listed through Category:Science and technology awards) and this one seems to fall within the range that is deemed appropriate for a separate page. Klbrain (talk) 07:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 16:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)